Reports Related to "Judicial Council of California"
Date Issued | Report Number | Report Title |
---|---|---|
January 9, 2024 | 2023-302 |
Judicial Branch Procurement: Judicial Council of California |
October 18, 2022 | 2021-113 |
Batterer Intervention Programs: State Guidance and Oversight Are Needed to Effectively Reduce Domestic Violence Fact Sheet (PDF) Full Report (HTML) Full Report (PDF) Recommendations |
January 13, 2022 | 2021-302 |
Judicial Branch Procurement: Judicial Council of California |
December 19, 2019 | 2019-302 |
Judicial Council of California |
April 9, 2019 | I2019-2 |
Investigations of Improper Activities by State Agencies and Employees: Inefficient Management of State Resources, Misuse of State Time and Inaccurate Attendance Records, and Inadequate Supervision Fact Sheet (PDF) Summary Full Report (HTML) Full Report (PDF) Recommendations |
December 19, 2017 | 2017-302 |
Judicial Council of California: It Needs to Follow Competitive Bidding Processes More Consistently and Establish Clear Guidance for Invoice Processing Fact Sheet (PDF) Summary Full Report (HTML) Full Report (PDF) Recommendations |
November 16, 2016 | 2016-301 |
Judicial Branch Procurement: The Five Superior Courts We Reviewed Mostly Adhered to Required and Recommended Practices, but Some Improvements Are Needed Fact Sheet (PDF) Summary Full Report (HTML) Full Report (PDF) Recommendations |
September 27, 2016 | 2016-401 |
Data Reliability: State Agencies' Computer-Generated Data Varied in Their Completeness and Accuracy |
February 25, 2016 | 2015-115 |
Dually Involved Youth: The State Cannot Determine the Effectiveness of Efforts to Serve Youth Who Are Involved in Both the Child Welfare and Juvenile Justice Systems Fact Sheet (PDF) Summary Full Report (HTML) Full Report (PDF) Recommendations |
January 5, 2016 | 2015-701 |
Recommendations for the Legislature From Audits Issued During 2014 and 2015 |
December 10, 2015 | 2015-302 |
Judicial Branch Procurement: Although the Judicial Council Needs to Strengthen Controls Over Its Information Systems, Its Procurement Practices Generally Comply With Applicable Requirements Fact Sheet (PDF) Summary Full Report (HTML) Full Report (PDF) Recommendations |
January 7, 2015 | 2014-107 |
Judicial Branch of California: Because of Questionable Fiscal and Operational Decisions, the Judicial Council and the Administrative Office of the Courts Have Not Maximized the Funds Available for the Courts Fact Sheet (PDF) Summary Full Report (PDF) Recommendations Testimony (PDF) Survey Responses |
March 12, 2014 | 2013-302.1 |
Administrative Office of the Courts Supplemental Letter Report |
March 19, 2013 | 2012-301 |
Judicial Branch Procurement: Six Superior Courts Generally Complied With the Judicial Branch Contracting Law, but They Could Improve Some Policies and Practices |
January 15, 2013 | 2012-041 |
Recommendations Not Fully Implemented After One Year: The Omnibus Audit Accountability Act of 2006 |
October 25, 2012 | 2012-401 |
Data Reliability: State Agencies' Computer-Generated Data Varied in Their Completeness and Accuracy |
January 5, 2012 | 2011-701 |
Recommendations for Legislative Consideration From Audits Issued During 2010 and 2011 |
August 18, 2011 | 2011-601 |
High Risk: The California State Auditor's Updated Assessment of High‑Risk Issues the State and Select State Agencies Face |
February 8, 2011 | 2010-102 |
Administrative Office of the Courts: The Statewide Case Management Project Faces Significant Challenges Due to Poor Project Management Fact Sheet (PDF) Summary Full Report (PDF) Recommendations Testimony (PDF) |
November 29, 2007 | 2007-109 |
DNA Identification Fund: Improvements Are Needed in Reporting Fund Revenues and Assessing and Distributing DNA Penalties, but Counties and Courts We Reviewed Have Properly Collected Penalties and Transferred Revenues to the State |
August 29, 2006 | 2005-131 |
Judicial Council of California: Its Governing Committee on Education Has Recently Proposed Minimum Education Requirements for Judicial Officers |
July 14, 2005 | 2004-118 |
Public Utilities Commission: Since the Judicial Review Act of 1998, the Number of Petitions Seeking Judicial Review of Commission Decisions Has Increased |