Reports Related to "Bar of California, State"
Date Issued | Report Number | Report Title |
---|---|---|
April 13, 2023 | 2022-031 |
The State Bar of California: It Will Need a Mandatory Licensing Fee Increase in 2024 to Support Its Operations Fact Sheet (PDF) Full Report (HTML) Full Report (PDF) Recommendations |
April 14, 2022 | 2022-030 |
The State Bar of California's Attorney Discipline Process: Weak Policies Limit Its Ability to Protect the Public From Attorney Misconduct Fact Sheet (PDF) Full Report (HTML) Full Report (PDF) Recommendations |
April 29, 2021 | 2020-030 |
The State Bar of California: It Is Not Effectively Managing Its System for Investigating and Disciplining Attorneys Who Abuse the Public Trust Fact Sheet (PDF) Summary Full Report (HTML) Full Report (PDF) Recommendations |
April 30, 2019 | 2018-030 |
State Bar of California: It Should Balance Fee Increases With Other Actions to Raise Revenue and Decrease Costs Fact Sheet (PDF) Summary Full Report (HTML) Full Report (PDF) Recommendations |
June 27, 2017 | 2017-030 |
The State Bar of California: It Needs Additional Revisions to Its Expense Policies to Ensure That It Uses Funds Prudently Fact Sheet (PDF) Summary Full Report (HTML) Full Report (PDF) Recommendations |
September 27, 2016 | 2016-401 |
Data Reliability: State Agencies' Computer-Generated Data Varied in Their Completeness and Accuracy |
May 12, 2016 | 2015-047 |
The State Bar of California: Its Lack of Transparency Has Undermined Its Communications With Decision Makers and Stakeholders Fact Sheet (PDF) Summary Full Report (HTML) Full Report (PDF) Recommendations |
January 5, 2016 | 2015-701 |
Recommendations for the Legislature From Audits Issued During 2014 and 2015 |
June 18, 2015 | 2015-030 |
State Bar of California: It Has Not Consistently Protected the Public Through Its Attorney Discipline Process and Lacks Accountability Fact Sheet (PDF) Summary Full Report (HTML) Full Report (PDF) Recommendations |
January 14, 2014 | 2013-041 |
Recommendations Not Fully Implemented After One Year: The Omnibus Audit Accountability Act of 2006 |
July 2, 2013 | 2013-030 |
State Bar of California: It Complies With Contracting Requirements, but It Could Improve Certain Practices to Ensure It Receives Best Value |
January 15, 2013 | 2012-041 |
Recommendations Not Fully Implemented After One Year: The Omnibus Audit Accountability Act of 2006 |
January 12, 2012 | 2011-041 |
Recommendations Not Fully Implemented After One Year: The Omnibus Audit Accountability Act of 2006 |
May 26, 2011 | 2011-030 |
State Bar of California: Its Lawyer Assistance Program Lacks Adequate Controls for Reporting on Participating Attorneys |
January 14, 2010 | 2009-041 |
Recommendations Not Fully Implemented After One Year: The Omnibus Audit Accountability Act of 2006 |
July 21, 2009 | 2009-030 |
State Bar of California: It Can Do More to Manage Its Disciplinary System and Probation Processes Effectively and to Control Costs |
January 20, 2009 | 2008-041 |
Recommendations Not Fully Implemented After One Year: The Omnibus Audit Accountability Act of 2006 |
April 26, 2007 | 2007-030 |
State Bar of California: With Strategic Planning Not Yet Completed, It Projects General Fund Deficits and Needs Continued Improvement in Program Administration |
April 28, 2005 | 2005-030 |
State Bar of California: It Should Continue Strengthening Its Monitoring of Disciplinary Case Processing and Assess the Financial Benefits of Its New Collection Enforcement Authority |
April 24, 2003 | 2002-030 |
State Bar of California: Although It Reasonably Sets and Manages Mandatory Fees, It Faces Potential Deficits in the Future and Needs to More Strictly Enforce Disciplinary Policies and Procedures |
April 25, 2001 | 99030 |
State Bar of California: It Has Improved Its Disciplinary Process, Stewardship of Members' Fees, and Administrative Practices, but Its Cost Recovery and Controls Over Expenses Need Strengthening |
May 20, 1998 | 98106 |
State Bar of California: Financial Outlook for the Admissions Fund Is Not As Bleak As Portrayed |
May 21, 1996 | 96021 |
State Bar of California: Opportunities Exist To Reduce Fees, Better Control Administration and Planning, and Strengthen an Improved Discipline Process |