Skip Repetitive Navigation Links
California State Auditor Logo
Report Number : 2016-036

Indian Gaming Special Distribution Fund
The Method Used to Mitigate Casino Impacts Has Changed, and Two Counties' Benefit Committees Did Not Ensure Compliance With State Law When Awarding Grants

Appendix

Indian Tribes in California With Tribal‑State Gaming Compacts

 

In 1999 the Governor negotiated and the Legislature approved legislation ratifying a number of tribal‑state gaming compacts between the State and federally recognized Indian tribes. Eventually, the State entered into 61 of these compacts. During fiscal years 2003–04 through 2015–16, the Legislature ratified 12 new tribal‑state compacts and amendments to 20 existing compacts. The 1999‑model compacts specify 2,000 as the maximum number of gaming devices that each tribe can operate. However, post‑1999‑model compacts ratified during fiscal years 2003–04 through 2015–16 contain different provisions regarding the maximum number of gaming devices allowed.

In accordance with audit standards, we are disclosing the existence of information that we have not published because of its confidential nature. As of September 2016, the Gambling Commission reported that the total number of class III gaming devices operated by California Indian tribes was more than 68,000.6 During the course of this audit, and in our prior audit, the Gambling Commission requested that we not provide information on the number of devices operated at each casino, pursuant to the compacts and Section 19821 of the Business and Professions Code, which state that such information should not be publicly disclosed.

Based on these sections of the compacts and state law, we agreed not to provide specific device counts. To provide a minimum level of disclosure, in a previous audit, the Gambling Commission agreed that classifying casinos by size according to ranges of devices would not violate the confidentiality requirements to which the commission is subject. As a result, in Table A, we present casinos by size according to several ranges of devices, as well as the maximum number of gaming devices each compact allows and the year that the Legislature voted to ratify the new or amended compact.

Table A
Indian Tribes in California With Tribal-State Gaming Compacts as of June 2016


County
Tribe Year Compact or
Most Recent Compact Amendment Was Ratified*
Casino Range of
Gaming Devices in Operation
(as of September 2016)
Maximum Number of Gaming Devices Allowed
Amador Buena Vista Rancheria of Me-Wuk Indians 2004 No 0 Unlimited‡
Jackson Rancheria of Miwuk Indians 2015 Yes 1,001 to 2,000 1,800
Butte Berry Creek Rancheria of Maidu Indians 1999 Yes 351 to 1,000 2,000
Mooretown Rancheria of Maidu Indians 1999 Yes 351 to 1,000 2,000
Colusa Cachil DeHe Band of Wintun Indians of the Colusa Indian Community of the Colusa Rancheria 2000 Yes 1,001 to 2,000 2,000
Del Norte Elk Valley Rancheria 1999 Yes 1 to 350 2,000
Resighini Rancheria 2000 No 0 2,000
Tolowa Dee-ni' Nation 1999 Yes 1 to 350 2,000
Yurok Tribe of the Yurok Reservation 2007 Yes 1 to 350 99
El Dorado Shingle Springs Band of Miwok Indians, Shingle Springs Rancheria (Verona Tract) 2013 Yes More than 2,000 3,000
Fresno Big Sandy Rancheria of Western Mono Indians 1999 Yes 1 to 350 2,000
Table Mountain Rancheria 1999 Yes 1,001 to 2,000 2,000
Humboldt Bear River Band of the Rohnerville Rancheria 2000 Yes 1 to 350 2,000
Blue Lake Rancheria 2000 Yes 351 to 1,000 2,000
Cher-Ae Heights Indian Community of the Trinidad Rancheria 1999 Yes 1 to 350 2,000
Hoopa Valley Tribe 1999 Yes 1 to 350 2,000
Imperial Quechan Tribe of the Fort Yuma Indian Reservation 2006 Yes 1,001 to 2,000 1,100
Torres Martinez Desert Cahuilla Indians 2003 Yes 1 to 350 2,000
Inyo Bishop Paiute Tribe 2000 Yes 1 to 350 2,000
Fort Independence Indian Community of Paiute Indians 2013 No 0 800
Kings Santa Rosa Indian Community of the Santa Rosa Rancheria 1999 Yes 1,001 to 2,000 2,000
Lake Big Valley Band of Pomo Indians of the Big Valley Rancheria 1999 Yes 1 to 350 2,000
Elem Indian Colony of Pomo Indians of the Sulphur Bank Rancheria 2000 No 0 2,000
Habematolel Pomo of Upper Lake 2011 Yes 1 to 350 750
Middletown Rancheria of Pomo Indians 1999 Yes 351 to 1,000 2,000
Robinson Rancheria Band of Pomo Indians 1999 Yes 1 to 350 2,000
Lassen Susanville Indian Rancheria 2000 Yes 1 to 350 2,000
Madera Picayune Rancheria of Chukchansi Indians of California 1999 Yes 1,001 to 2,000 2,000
Mendocino Cahto Tribe 1999 Yes 1 to 350 2,000
Coyote Valley Reservation 2012 Yes 1 to 350 1,250
Hopland Band of Pomo Indians 1999 Yes 1 to 350 2,000
Manchester Band of Pomo Indians of the Manchester Rancheria 2000 Yes 1 to 350 2,000
Pinoleville Pomo Nation 2011 No 0 900
Sherwood Valley Rancheria of Pomo Indians 1999 Yes 1 to 350 2,000
Modoc Alturas Indian Rancheria 2000 Yes 1 to 350 2,000
Placer United Auburn Indian Community of the Auburn Rancheria 2015 Yes More than 2,000 3,500
Riverside Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians of the Agua Caliente Indian Reservation 2007 Yes 1,001 to 2,000 5,000
Augustine Band of Cahuilla Indians 2000 Yes 351 to 1,000 2,000
Cabazon Band of Mission Indians 1999 Yes 1,001 to 2,000 2,000
Cahuilla Band of Mission Indians of the Cahuilla Reservation 1999 Yes 1 to 350 2,000
Morongo Band of Mission Indians 2007 Yes More than 2,000 7,500
Pechanga Band of Luiseno Mission Indians of the Pechanga Reservation 2007 Yes More than 2,000 7,500
Ramona Band of Cahuilla 2013 No 0 750
Soboba Band of Luiseno Indians 1999 Yes 1,001 to 2,000 2,000
Twenty-Nine Palms Band of Mission Indians 2000 Yes§ 1,001 to 2,000 2,000
San Bernardino Chemehuevi Indian Tribe of the Chemehuevi Reservation 1999 Yes 1 to 350 2,000
Fort Mojave Indian Tribe of Arizona, California, and Nevada 2004 No 0 1,500
San Manuel Band of Mission Indians 2007 Yes More than 2,000 7,500
San Diego Barona Group of Capitan Grande Band of Mission Indians of the Barona Reservation 2000 Yes 1,001 to 2,000 2,000
Campo Band of Diegueno Mission Indians of the Campo Indian Reservation 1999 Yes 351 to 1,000 2,000
Ewiiaapaayp Band of Kumeyaay Indians 1999 No 0 2,000
Jamul Indian Village 2000 No 0 2,000
La Jolla Band of Luiseno Mission Indians 1999 No 0 2,000
La Posta Band of Diegueno Mission Indians of the La Posta Indian Reservation 2003 No 0 350
Manzanita Band of Diegueno Mission Indians of the Manzanita Reservation 1999 No 0 2,000
Pala Band of Luiseno Mission Indians of the Pala Reservation 2004 Yes 1,001 to 2,000 Unlimited
Pauma Band of Luiseno Mission Indians of the Pauma and Yuima Reservation 2004ll Yes 1,001 to 2,000 Unlimited
Rincon Band of Luiseno Mission Indians of the Rincon Reservation 2013 Yes 1,001 to 2,000 2,250
San Pasqual Band of Digueno Mission Indians 1999 Yes 1,001 to 2,000 2,000
Sycuan Band of the Kumeyaay Nation 2015 Yes More than 2,000 2,500
Iipay Nation of Santa Ysabel 2003 No 0 350
Viejas (Baron Long) Group of Capitan Grande Band of Mission Indians of the Viegas Reservation 2014 Yes 1,001 to 2,000 4,500
Santa Barbara Santa Ynez Band of Chumash Mission Indians of the
Santa Ynez Reservation
2015 Yes More than 2,000 2,500
Shasta Pit River Tribe (includes XL Ranch, Big Bend, Likely, Lookout, Montgomery Creek, and Roaring Creek Rancherias) 2000 Yes 1 to 350 2,000
Redding Rancheria 1999 Yes 351 to 1,000 2,000
Siskiyou Karuk Tribe 2014 No 0 1,500
Sonoma Dry Creek Rancheria Band of Pomo Indians 1999 Yes 1,001 to 2,000 2,000
Federated Indians of Graton Rancheria 2012 Yes More than 2,000 3,000
Tehama Paskenta Band of Nomlaki Indians 1999 Yes 351 to 1,000 2,000
Tulare Tule River Indian Tribe of the Tule River Reservation 2000 Yes 1,001 to 2,000 2,000
Tuolumne Band of Me-Wuk Indians of the Tuolumne Rancheria 1999 Yes 1,001 to 2,000 2,000
Tuolumne Chicken Ranch Rancheria of Me-Wuk Indians 2000 Yes 1 to 350 2,000
Tuolumne Band of Me-Wuk Indians of the Tuolumne Rancheria 1999 Yes 1,001 to 2,000 2,000
Yolo Yocha Dehe Wintun Nation 2004 Yes More than 2,000 Unlimited

Sources: California Gambling Control Commission (Gambling Commission) website, Gambling Commission, and tribal-state compacts.

* Date the executed compact was ratified by the Legislature or by the voters through the referendum process.

Although under compacts they have the authority to operate a casino, some tribes do not.

These tribes may operate an unlimited number of devices as long as they pay additional fees per gaming device. 

§ This tribe has casino locations in both Riverside and San Bernardino.

ll In October 2015, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit concluded that Pauma’s 2004 amendment was rescinded. Therefore, the tribe is subject to the 1999 compact for purposes of payment obligations.






Footnotes

6 Class III gaming includes lotteries, certain card games, and slot machines. Gaming device means a slot machine.Go back to text

 

Back to top