Report 2010-102 Recommendations and Responses in 2014-041
Report 2010-102: Administrative Office of the Courts: The Statewide Case Management Project Faces Significant Challenges Due to Poor Project Management
| Department | Number of Years Reported As Not Fully Implemented | Total Recommendations to Department | Not Implemented After One Year | Not Implemented as of 2013-041 Response | Not Implemented as of Most Recent Response |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Administrative Office of the Courts | 3 | 37 | 10 | 2 | 0 |
Recommendation To: Administrative Office of the Courts
Although the Judicial Council has the legal authority to compel the courts to adopt CCMS, to better foster superior court receptiveness to deploying CCMS, the AOC should continue to work with the superior courts that have deployed the civil system to ensure it is addressing their concerns in a timely and appropriate manner.
Response
At the Judicial Council meeting of August 22, 2014 the council approved the Court Technology Governance and Strategic Plan which has the three primary components:
1. Technology Governance and Funding Model
2. Strategic Plan for Technology
3. Tachtical Plan for Technology
Below is the item number of the agenda item and the address at which it can be located.
Item 4 3:20-4:20 p.m.
Judicial Branch Administration: Court Technology Governance and Strategic Plans (Action Required)
- Presentation
- Audiocast (41:57)
http://www.courts.ca.gov/documents/jc-20140822-item4.pdf
As previously discussed, at the time of the above being formally adopted by the council the issue would be considered fully implemented.
- California State Auditor's Assessment of Status: Fully Implemented
- Completion Date: September 2014
- Response Date: August 2014
Recommendation To: Administrative Office of the Courts
Although the Judicial Council has the legal authority to compel the courts to adopt CCMS, to better foster superior court receptiveness to deploying CCMS, the AOC should work with superior courts to address concerns about hosting data at the California Court Technology Center (Technology Center). Further, the AOC should take steps to ensure that superior courts do not lose productivity or efficiencies by hosting data at the Technology Center.
Response
At the Judicial Council meeting of August 22, 2014 the council approved the Court Technology Governance and Strategic Plan which has the three primary components:
1. Technology Governance and Funding Model
2. Strategic Plan for Technology
3. Tachtical Plan for Technology
Below is the item number of the agenda item and the address at which it can be located.
Item 4 3:20-4:20 p.m.
Judicial Branch Administration: Court Technology Governance and Strategic Plans (Action Required)
- Presentation
- Audiocast (41:57)
http://www.courts.ca.gov/documents/jc-20140822-item4.pdf
As previously discussed, at the time of the above being formally adopted by the council the issue would be considered fully implemented.
- California State Auditor's Assessment of Status: Fully Implemented
- Completion Date: September 2014
- Response Date: August 2014