Report 2022-109 All Recommendation Responses

Report 2022-109: California State University: It Did Not Adequately or Consistently Address Some Allegations of Sexual Harassment (Release Date: July 2023)

Recommendation #1 To: University, California State

To ensure that campuses consistently and appropriately justify and document their decisions about whether to conduct formal investigations, the Chancellor's Office should, by July 2024, create clearer and more comprehensive expectations for how campuses should perform and document their initial assessments of allegations. The written procedures or guidelines it develops should apply, at a minimum, to any report or complaint that includes allegations of possible sexual harassment involving an employee respondent and should do the following:

- Require campuses to determine whether a respondent has been the subject of multiple or prior reports of misconduct.

- Clarify how to assess the benefits and risks of conducting or not conducting an investigation when there are challenges with or ambiguities about a complainant's desire or ability to participate. Such an assessment might include applying more broadly the factors that CSU's policy already incorporates when a complainant explicitly requests that no investigation occurs.

- Provide guidance about attempting to identify or contact any potential complainants mentioned or discovered during the intake and initial assessment process and about evaluating the likelihood that an investigation could reveal new allegations, context, or information.

- Specify that if a campus decides not to conduct an investigation because a report or complaint fails to allege a sexual harassment policy violation, the campus must explain why there are clear indications that the alleged conduct, even if true, could not reasonably meet CSU's definition of sexual harassment.

- Require a thorough, documented rationale for campuses' decisions about whether to conduct an investigation that addresses, at a minimum, any applicable factors listed above and any other relevant factors in CSU's policy.

6-Month Agency Response

The Chancellor's Office further refined and finalized the intake and initial assessment checklist with protocols to standardize operations. It was provided to campuses on October 27, 2023, with a directive to begin using it on November 1, 2023.

In addition, intake and initial assessment guidance was provided to campuses on January 8, 2024.

California State Auditor's Assessment of 6-Month Status: Fully Implemented

The Chancellor's Office's guidance and checklist on the intake and initial assessment contain all of the elements from our recommendation.

60-Day Agency Response

Through its Nondiscrimination Policy workgroup, the Chancellor's Office will, in the form of written procedures or guidelines, develop clearer and more comprehensive expectations for how campuses should perform and document their initial assessments of allegations. The workgroup is currently meeting twice per month; meeting frequency will be increased as necessary. The Chancellor's Office has distributed a draft intake and initial assessment checklist for campuses to use when a report of sexual harassment or other sexual misconduct is received by a campus Title IX office. The Chancellor's Office will continue to evaluate and refine this checklist to ensure its efficacy as an initial assessment tool for campuses. In July 2023, the Chancellor's Office hosted its annual three-day systemwide Title IX and Discrimination, Harassment, and Retaliation (DHR) conference for all Title IX Coordinators, Deputy Title IX Coordinators and Investigators. Multiple training sessions offered at the conference reviewed the initial assessment process, and one session was dedicated to this topic.

California State Auditor's Assessment of 60-Day Status: Pending

Recommendation #2 To: University, California State

To ensure that campuses conduct consistent and effective investigations of allegations of sexual harassment, the Chancellor's Office should, by July 2024, establish more specific expectations for how investigators should structure their analyses of evidence and their determinations in sexual harassment investigation reports. The written procedures or guidelines should, at minimum, do the following:

- Specify how investigators should perform and document credibility evaluations.

- Require that before investigators assess whether the alleged conduct violated policy, they document an assessment of each allegation that establishes whether the alleged conduct likely occurred and that these assessments consider all relevant conduct for which the investigator has identified evidence.

- Require investigators to document analysis specific to each relevant component of CSU's sexual harassment definition that addresses whether conduct met or did not meet the particular component of the definition.

- Require that investigators' analyses and final determinations about whether conduct violated the sexual harassment policy take into account the cumulative effect of all relevant conduct found to have likely occurred.

1-Year Agency Response

In June 2024, the Chancellor's Office issued guidance for Title IX and Discrimination, Harassment, Retaliation (DHR) practitioners on the structure of analysis and determinations in sexual harassment investigation reports.

The guidance specifies how investigators should perform credibility evaluations, record the thought process behind their analysis and conclusions, and document their analysis for each relevant component of the sexual harassment definition. The guidance also provides a framework for how investigators should make a final determination that considers the cumulative effect of all conduct that the investigator determined to have, more likely than not, occurred.

California State Auditor's Assessment of 1-Year Status: Fully Implemented

The Chancellor's Office's guidance on the structure of analysis and determinations in sexual harassment investigation reports includes the specific guidelines we list in our recommendation, such as specifying how investigators should perform and document credibility evaluations. This new guidance implements all of the elements in our recommendation.

6-Month Agency Response

Written guidelines are in development which will establish specific expectations for investigators in terms of structuring their analyses of evidence and determinations in investigation reports, including those pertaining to sexual harassment investigations. The subject of the guidelines may be addressed in new regulations from the Office of Civil Rights (OCR), U.S. Department of Education. The guidelines are expected in March 2024.

California State Auditor's Assessment of 6-Month Status: Pending

60-Day Agency Response

In July 2023, the Chancellor's Office hosted its annual three-day systemwide Title IX and Discrimination, Harassment, and Retaliation (DHR) conference for all university Title IX Coordinators, Deputy Title IX Coordinators and Investigators. Training sessions at the conference discussed expectations for how investigators should structure their analyses and determinations, including a session focused on the performance and documentation of credibility evaluations, a session focused on the application of factual findings to policy, and a session on evidentiary analysis and report writing.

The Chancellor's Office will create written guidelines which will establish more specific expectations for investigators in terms of structuring the analyses of evidence and determinations in investigation reports, including those pertaining to sexual harassment investigations.

California State Auditor's Assessment of 60-Day Status: Pending

Recommendation #3 To: University, California State

To ensure that campuses' determinations about sexual harassment are consistent and appropriate, the Chancellor's Office should create and disseminate written guidance by July 2024 that provides a framework for how investigators should interpret each component of CSU's sexual harassment definition and how they should determine whether alleged conduct meets that definition. The guidance should include specific examples as necessary.

1-Year Agency Response

In June 2024, the Chancellor's Office issued guidance for Title IX / Discrimination, Harassment, Retaliation (DHR) practitioners that provides a framework to assist with investigators' interpretation of each component of the definition of sexual harassment. The guidance includes specific examples.

California State Auditor's Assessment of 1-Year Status: Fully Implemented

The Chancellor's Office's guidance includes a framework for how investigators should interpret each component of CSU's sexual harassment definition and how investigators should determine whether alleged conduct meets that definition. The guidance also includes examples. This new guidance implements our recommendation.

6-Month Agency Response

The Chancellor's Office is developing written guidance that provides a framework for how investigators should interpret each component of CSU's sexual harassment definition and how they should determine whether alleged conduct meets that definition. The written guidance will include specific examples as necessary. A first draft of the guidance is expected to be completed by March 1, 2024.

California State Auditor's Assessment of 6-Month Status: Pending

60-Day Agency Response

Through its Nondiscrimination Policy workgroup, the Chancellor's Office will create and disseminate written guidance that provides a framework for how investigators should interpret each component of CSU's sexual harassment definition and how they should determine whether alleged conduct meets that definition. The written guidance will include specific examples as necessary. The workgroup is currently meeting twice per month; meeting frequency will be increased as necessary.

California State Auditor's Assessment of 60-Day Status: Pending

Recommendation #4 To: University, California State

To ensure consistency in campuses' responses to sexual harassment allegations and mitigate the risk of inappropriate interference, the Chancellor's Office should amend CSU's sexual harassment policy or create other procedures by July 2024 to require a documented review and approval of the analyses and outcomes of each report of sexual harassment. In particular, the Chancellor's Office should specify the following:

- Unless resource constraints or other good causes exist, the campus Title IX coordinator should assign each case to another staff member or investigator. The coordinator should then document his or her review of each case, including certification that the case's resolution—such as the initial assessment or the investigation and related report, as applicable—aligns with policy requirements.

- For exceptions such as cases that the Title IX coordinator handles directly, another qualified reviewer should document his or her review and approval of the analyses and outcomes.

1-Year Agency Response

In June 2024, the Chancellor's Office issued guidance for Title IX / Discrimination, Harassment, Retaliation (DHR) practitioners. The guidance includes a procedure detailing the internal review of sexual harassment complaints and investigations. The guidance also specifies that the Title IX coordinator or DHR administrator will assign complaints to an internal or external investigator, as appropriate. If resource constraints or other good cause exist, the Title IX coordinator or DHR administrator may investigate the complaint.

California State Auditor's Assessment of 1-Year Status: Fully Implemented

The Chancellor's Office's guidance on investigating reports of sexual harassment includes a process for the documented review and approval of the analyses and outcomes of each report of sexual harassment. The new guidance implements each element specified in our recommendation.

6-Month Agency Response

The Chancellor's Office will require a documented review and approval of the analyses and outcomes of each report of sexual harassment. The Chancellor's Office will revise its Nondiscrimination Policy to reflect this requirement or will create specific guidance to ensure compliance.

California State Auditor's Assessment of 6-Month Status: Pending

60-Day Agency Response

The Chancellor's Office will require a documented review and approval of the analyses and outcomes of each report of sexual harassment. The Chancellor's Office Nondiscrimination Policy workgroup met in August 2023 to address this policy amendment and plans to meet again in September and thereafter twice per month; meeting frequency will be increased as necessary.

California State Auditor's Assessment of 60-Day Status: Pending

Recommendation #5 To: University, California State

To ensure that campuses adequately address problematic behavior that does not meet the threshold of sexual harassment, the Chancellor's Office should, by January 2025, establish a systemwide policy or systemwide procedures for addressing this type of unprofessional or inappropriate conduct. At minimum, the Chancellor's Office should require that when campuses determine through an investigation that a respondent's conduct does not meet the threshold of sexual harassment, but that the conduct nevertheless occurred and was unprofessional or inappropriate, campuses make written findings specific to the unprofessional conduct and impose discipline or corrective action, as appropriate, based on the conduct.

1-Year Agency Response

The Chancellor's Office has developed draft guidance for assessing and addressing problematic behavior that does not meet the threshold of sexual harassment, but which is nevertheless unprofessional or inappropriate. The draft guidance was presented to the Board of Trustees during the May 2024 meeting as an information item. The Board of Trustees reviewed the guidance and provided feedback. Additionally, other stakeholder groups are reviewing the guidance and the Chancellor's Office has been collecting feedback since April 2024. The Chancellor's Office is reviewing the feedback and will issue updated guidance by January 2025.

California State Auditor's Assessment of 1-Year Status: Pending

6-Month Agency Response

The Chancellor's Office is developing guidance for assessing and addressing problematic behavior that does not meet the threshold of sexual harassment, but which is nevertheless unprofessional or inappropriate. A status update will be provided to the Board of Trustees at the January 2024 meeting.

California State Auditor's Assessment of 6-Month Status: Pending

60-Day Agency Response

The Chancellor's Office is developing a process to address problematic behavior that does not meet the threshold of sexual harassment, but which is nevertheless unprofessional or inappropriate.

California State Auditor's Assessment of 60-Day Status: Pending

Recommendation #6 To: University, California State

To ensure the effectiveness of the informal resolution process, the Chancellor's Office should, by July 2024, provide additional guidance to campuses related to this process. In particular, the guidance should clarify how campuses should offer complainants information about possible remedies that address their concerns. For example, the Chancellor's Office could work with campuses to create a template for an informal resolution agreement that also includes examples of specific corrective action options or other outcomes that parties could consider when determining remedies.

1-Year Agency Response

In June 2024, the Chancellor's Office issued additional guidance related to the informal resolution process. The guidance included a memorandum describing the informal resolution process, a notice of request for informal resolution, an informal resolution agreement template and information sheet. The informal resolution information sheet and agreement template includes examples of specific corrective action options and other outcomes that parties can consider when determining remedies. Prior to this additional guidance, the CSU's nondiscrimination policy provided guidance on the informal resolution process.

California State Auditor's Assessment of 1-Year Status: Fully Implemented

The Chancellor's Office's guidance documents related to the informal resolution process includes information about how campuses should offer complainants information about possible remedies to address their concerns, including a template for an information resolution agreement with examples of specific correction action options. This new guidance implements all elements in our recommendation.

6-Month Agency Response

The Chancellor's Office is developing additional guidance related to the informal resolution process as well as methods for campuses to explain the process and describe remedies that could be incorporated into an informal resolution. A first draft of the guidance is expected to be completed by May 2024.

In addition, the Chancellor's Office is developing a workshop to further educate campuses about the informal resolution process.

California State Auditor's Assessment of 6-Month Status: Pending

60-Day Agency Response

In July 2023, the Chancellor's Office hosted its annual three-day systemwide Title IX and Discrimination, Harassment, and Retaliation (DHR) conference for all Title IX Coordinators, Deputy Title IX Coordinators and Investigators. A conference session was dedicated to the discussion of the informal resolution process. In addition, the Chancellor's Office will develop additional guidance related to the informal resolution process and to evaluate methods that campuses could use to most effectively provide information to complainants and respondents about potential corrective actions options or other outcomes.

California State Auditor's Assessment of 60-Day Status: Pending

Recommendation #7 To: University, California State

To improve the timeliness of campuses' responses to sexual harassment allegations, the Chancellor's Office should require all campuses to track key dates and timeline extensions related to reports of sexual harassment in a consistent manner by July 2024. For example, it could require the use of a tracking spreadsheet or automated alerts to ensure that campuses
are aware of relevant deadlines and that they identify any trends in their timeliness of handling reports.

1-Year Agency Response

In June 2024, the Chancellor's Office issued guidance that clarifies the importance of consistently tracking key dates and timeline extensions for complaints and investigations under the CSU's nondiscrimination policy. It is intended to help support university campuses improve the timely completion of investigations and ensure that extensions of these deadlines are only for good cause and documented in writing. As part of this guidance, the Chancellor's Office outlined the list of key dates related to investigations of sexual harassment and specifically requires that the Title IX Coordinator/DHR Administrator adhere to these timelines. The guidance outlined the criteria for what constitutes good cause to permit timeline extensions, the procedure that should be followed, and requires this information to be maintained in the Title IX / DHR case file.

California State Auditor's Assessment of 1-Year Status: Fully Implemented

The Chancellor's Office's guidance document recommends that all campuses use a standardized system while is it working to identify and select a unified case management system to help support consistency in tracking key dates and timeline extensions for each campus. The guidance also refers to a workbook that includes an example tracking spreadsheet and the elements to be tracked. These documents satisfy the elements in our recommendation.

6-Month Agency Response

The Chancellor's Office is preparing to procure a systemwide electronic case management system that will serve as a repository of data and a hub for identifying trends, reporting data, and monitoring compliance with investigation and other case-related timelines. No later than July 2024, the Chancellor's Office will, in consultation with Chancellor's Office and campus stakeholders, identify the data fields campuses shall maintain in case files to ensure greater consistency and integrity of data once published.

Prior to the deployment of a systemwide case management system, the Chancellor's Office will develop a procedure to be used by all campuses to track this information using other available software tools.

California State Auditor's Assessment of 6-Month Status: Pending

60-Day Agency Response

The Chancellor's Office intends to procure a systemwide electronic case management system that will serve as a repository of data and a hub for identifying trends, reporting data, and monitoring compliance with investigation and other case-related timelines. No later than July 2024, the Chancellor's Office will clarify and refine the data fields to be maintained by the universities so as to ensure greater consistency and integrity of data once published.

Prior to the deployment of a systemwide case management system, the Chancellor's Office will develop a procedure to be used by all campuses to track this information using other available software tools.

California State Auditor's Assessment of 60-Day Status: Pending

Recommendation #8 To: University, California State

To better ensure the timeliness of investigations, the Chancellor's Office should identify a solution by July 2024 for ascertaining that campuses have adequate resources for conducting formal investigations. As part of this process, the Chancellor's Office should consider whether employing a pool of dedicated systemwide investigators who are external to campuses would help provide timely, consistent, and independent investigations for campuses when they choose not to investigate allegations themselves or lack the available internal resources to do so. Finally, once it has identified a solution, the Chancellor's Office should implement this solution.

1-Year Agency Response

In June 2024, the Chancellor's Office provided guidance to all CSU Title IX coordinators and Discrimination, Harassment, and Retaliation (DHR) administrators on the procedure by which university campuses shall retain external investigators to investigate allegations of conduct prohibited by the CSU's nondiscrimination policy. Each Title IX coordinator / DHR administrator may request a specific investigator or be assigned an investigator from a list of external investigators developed by the Chancellor's Office.

The procedure ensures that campuses have adequate resources for conducting formal investigations by allowing for the retention of external investigators. By following the procedure, the CSU will maintain consistency in the identification, selection, retention, and evaluation of the services provided by external investigators.

California State Auditor's Assessment of 1-Year Status: Fully Implemented

The Chancellor's Office's guidance on retaining external investigators refers to an investigator list developed by the Chancellor's Office and that individual campuses can work with the Chancellor's office to retain an external investigator if needed. This solution satisfies the elements in our recommendation.

6-Month Agency Response

The Chancellor's Office continues to evaluate staffing solutions including whether to employ a pool of dedicated systemwide investigators.

In addition, the Chancellor's Office is considering strategies for centralizing the hearing process across campuses.

California State Auditor's Assessment of 6-Month Status: Pending

60-Day Agency Response

The Chancellor's Office is evaluating additional staffing solutions including whether to employ a pool of dedicated systemwide investigators.

California State Auditor's Assessment of 60-Day Status: Pending

Recommendation #9 To: University, California State

To more effectively communicate the status of cases to the parties involved, the Chancellor's Office should amend CSU's sexual harassment policy by January 2025 to include specific requirements for campuses to provide regular status updates to complainants and respondents unless those parties request not to receive them. These updates should also communicate the outcomes of cases, including any associated disciplinary or corrective actions, to the extent possible under law. The Chancellor's Office should also consider developing or requiring campuses to develop a method for allowing complainants and respondents to check the status of their specific cases at any time through an online portal, dashboard, or similar means.

1-Year Agency Response

The Chancellor's Office is currently updating the nondiscrimination policy, which includes expectations for providing case status updates to parties. The draft nondiscrimination policy includes specific requirements for campuses to provide regular status updates to complainants and respondents every 30 days unless those parties request not to receive them. The draft nondiscrimination policy is undergoing stakeholder review and is expected to be issued in August 2024. As the Chancellor's Office is preparing to procure a systemwide electronic case management system, we have requested that vendors specify whether their system allows the parties to check the status of their specific cases at any time.

California State Auditor's Assessment of 1-Year Status: Pending

6-Month Agency Response

The Chancellor's Office is developing guidance regarding expectations for providing case status updates to parties.

California State Auditor's Assessment of 6-Month Status: Pending

60-Day Agency Response

The Chancellor's Office Nondiscrimination Policy workgroup met in August 2023 to discuss amendments to CSU's sexual harassment policy that will require campuses to provide regular status updates to complainants and respondents.

The Nondiscrimination Policy will be revised after the release of the new Title IX regulations (expected in late 2023 or early 2024).

California State Auditor's Assessment of 60-Day Status: Pending

Recommendation #10 To: University, California State

To ensure that campuses provide prompt discipline, the Chancellor's Office should provide guidance to campuses by July 2024 about best practices for initiating, carrying out, and documenting timely disciplinary or corrective actions after a finding of sexual harassment. Further, it should encourage campuses to communicate these principles to relevant decision makers. This guidance should include providing a prompt notice of pending disciplinary action to a respondent when applicable.

1-Year Agency Response

The Chancellor's Office has developed guidance about expectations with respect to initiating, carrying out, and documenting timely disciplinary or corrective actions after a finding of sexual harassment, and about the necessity to consult with the Title IX and DHR offices to ensure consistent disciplinary outcomes. The guidance was shared with all CSU Title IX coordinators and Discrimination, Harassment, and Retaliation (DHR) administrators.

California State Auditor's Assessment of 1-Year Status: Fully Implemented

The Chancellor's Office issued guidance for initiating, carrying out, and documenting timely disciplinary or corrective actions after a finding of sexual harassment. The new guidance implements all elements of our recommendation.

6-Month Agency Response

The Chancellor's Office is developing guidance about expectations with respect to initiating, carrying out, and documenting timely disciplinary or corrective actions after a finding of sexual harassment, and about the necessity to consult with the Title IX and DHR offices to ensure consistent disciplinary outcomes.

California State Auditor's Assessment of 6-Month Status: Pending

60-Day Agency Response

The Chancellor's Office will develop guidance about best practices for initiating, carrying out, and documenting timely disciplinary or corrective actions after a finding of sexual harassment.

California State Auditor's Assessment of 60-Day Status: Pending

Recommendation #11 To: University, California State

To ensure that campuses make and document appropriate efforts to address sexual harassment allegations, the Chancellor's Office should, by July 2024, develop procedures or guidelines that include a specific list of documents that the campus Title IX coordinator must maintain in a sexual harassment case file before closing the case. The Chancellor's Office should consider attaching these guidelines to the CSU sexual harassment policy. The list should include the following, at a minimum:

- Documentation of the campus's initial assessment of allegations and its rationale for whether or not to conduct an investigation.

- Any evidence relevant to the allegations and documentation of all interview notes or transcripts.

- If applicable, an informal resolution agreement signed by all parties and documentation of the agreed-upon outcomes.

- Any significant correspondence between Title IX staff and the parties, from the report stage through case closure, including emails and notices of allegations, investigation, extension, and outcome.

- If applicable, the preliminary investigation report or review of evidence and the final investigation report.

- Evidence of and specific details about the disciplinary or corrective actions that the campus took to resolve the case.

1-Year Agency Response

The Chancellor's Office has developed guidance that includes a list of documents that the campus Title IX coordinator must maintain in a sexual harassment case file before closing the case. The guidance was shared with all CSU Title IX coordinators and Discrimination, Harassment, and Retaliation (DHR) administrators.

California State Auditor's Assessment of 1-Year Status: Fully Implemented

The Chancellor's Office's guidance on maintenance of case files includes a list of documents that matches all of the elements listed in our recommendation.

6-Month Agency Response

The Chancellor's Office has developed guidance that is in the process of being finalized. The guidance includes a list of documents that the campus Title IX coordinator must maintain in a sexual harassment case file before closing the case.

California State Auditor's Assessment of 6-Month Status: Pending

60-Day Agency Response

The Chancellor's Office will develop procedures or guidelines that include a specific list of documents that the campus Title IX coordinator must maintain in a sexual harassment case file before closing the case.

California State Auditor's Assessment of 60-Day Status: Pending

Recommendation #12 To: University, California State

To improve the quality and consistency of campuses' data and case files, the Chancellor's Office should require that, by July 2026, all campuses use the same electronic case management system to securely maintain sexual harassment data and case files and ensure that all campuses' case management systems are also accessible to systemwide Title IX staff. In addition, the Chancellor's Office should develop and disseminate guidance for consistently tracking data in each campus's system, including requiring that each system include the same fields for entering relevant data such as key dates and corrective actions taken. The guidance should also ensure that campuses maintain data sufficient to identify and address any concerning patterns or trends related to repeat subjects, particular departments, specific student or employee populations, or similar issues.

1-Year Agency Response

The Chancellor's Office is preparing to procure a systemwide electronic case management system that will serve as a repository of data and a hub for identifying trends, reporting data, and monitoring compliance with investigation and other case-related timelines. The Chancellor's Office finalized the criteria for the vendor bids and is currently drafting the Request for Proposal (RFP). A first draft of the RFP will be completed by July 9, 2024.

In addition, as mentioned in our response to recommendation 11, the Chancellor's Office provided the campuses a list of the data fields to be maintained in each case file to ensure greater consistency and integrity of data.

California State Auditor's Assessment of 1-Year Status: Pending

6-Month Agency Response

The Chancellor's Office is preparing to procure a systemwide electronic case management system that will serve as a repository of data and a hub for identifying trends, reporting data, and monitoring compliance with investigation and other case-related timelines. In addition, no later than August 2024, the Chancellor's Office will provide the campuses a list of the data fields to be maintained in each case file to ensure greater consistency and integrity of data.

California State Auditor's Assessment of 6-Month Status: Pending

60-Day Agency Response

The Chancellor's Office intends to procure a systemwide electronic case management system that will serve as a repository of data and a hub for identifying trends, reporting data, and monitoring compliance with investigation and other case-related timelines. No later than July 2024, the Chancellor's Office will clarify and refine the data fields to be maintained by the universities so as to ensure greater consistency and integrity of data once published.

California State Auditor's Assessment of 60-Day Status: Pending

Recommendation #13 To: University, California State

To improve CSU's systemwide response to sexual harassment, the Chancellor's Office should establish a process no later than July 2024 for regularly collecting and analyzing sexual harassment data—via annual Title IX reports or a similar mechanism—from all campuses to identify any concerning patterns or trends, such as those involving repeat subjects, particular academic departments, or specific student or employee populations. As a part of these efforts, it should also collect and analyze data related to the timeliness of campuses' responses to allegations. When it identifies concerning trends or patterns, the Chancellor's Office should share its findings with the campuses and offer guidance for addressing the issues in question. Finally, upon implementing the recommendation that all campuses use the same case management system, the Chancellor's Office should use these systems to collect and facilitate its analysis of these data.

1-Year Agency Response

The Chancellor's Office has established a process for regularly collecting and analyzing sexual harassment data through its Annual Report Survey, which campuses are required to complete each year. The Chancellor's Office revised the survey to ensure more accurate and refined data about case statistics and to capture data required by California Education Code, Section 66282. The data from the survey allows each campus to identify concerning patterns or trends to strengthen the CSU's response to discrimination, harassment, and retaliation.

California State Auditor's Assessment of 1-Year Status: Partially Implemented

The Chancellor's Office has established a process for regularly collecting and analyzing sexual harassment data from all campuses to identify any concerning patterns or trends, such as those involving repeat subjects, particular academic departments, or specific student or employee populations. The Chancellor's Office indicated that the data will allows each university to identify concerning patterns or trends to strengthen the systemwide response to discrimination, harassment, and retaliation. It further indicates that this information also assists with training and prevention efforts. Now that the Chancellor's Office has established this process, we will assess this recommendation as partially implemented until the Chancellor's Office provides evidence of its analysis of sexual harassment data, and any resulting findings and guidance it shares with campuses.

6-Month Agency Response

The Chancellor's Office is working to establish a process for regularly collecting and analyzing sexual harassment data upon acquisition of a systemwide electronic case management system. The Chancellor's Office is in the final stages of revising the survey that each campus will complete on an annual basis to ensure more accurate and refined data about case statistics and to capture data required by California Education Code, Section 66282. In addition, the Chancellor's Office is developing other tools designed to identify patterns and trends of concern on campuses.

California State Auditor's Assessment of 6-Month Status: Pending

60-Day Agency Response

The Chancellor's Office intends to procure a systemwide electronic case management system that will serve as a repository of data and a hub for identifying trends, reporting data, and monitoring compliance with investigation and other case-related timelines. No later than July 2024, the Chancellor's Office will clarify and refine the data fields to be maintained by the universities so as to ensure greater consistency and integrity of the data collected. The Chancellor's Office will establish a process for regularly collecting and analyzing sexual harassment data upon acquisition of a systemwide electronic case management system and will ensure an alternative process is established for doing so until the systemwide solution is acquired.

California State Auditor's Assessment of 60-Day Status: Pending

Recommendation #14 To: University, California State

To assist campuses in providing a harassment-free environment for their students and employees, the Chancellor's Office should, by July 2024, create a policy—such as an attachment to its sexual harassment policy—for conducting regular compliance reviews of its campus Title IX offices to determine whether they are complying with relevant portions of federal law, state law, CSU policy, and best practices for preventing, detecting, and addressing sexual harassment and related misconduct. The Chancellor's Office should publicize the results of these reviews to the extent possible considering confidentiality concerns, and it should similarly publicize any steps it has taken or plans to take to address areas of concern it identifies. In preparation for performing this work, the Chancellor's Office should determine the number of additional staff that it will need to conduct these reviews.

1-Year Agency Response

In June 2024, the Chancellor's Office updated its Nondiscrimination Policy with an attachment on Title IX / Discrimination, Harassment, and Retaliation (DHR) Program Compliance Reviews. The Chancellor's Office will conduct regular compliance reviews of the Title IX / DHR programs of each university campus. These reviews will be conducted by a systemwide director for civil rights in partnership with the university campus under review. The review will be undertaken at least once every three years.

Beginning in Fall 2024, four to five university campuses will be reviewed in each of the next five consecutive semesters. The sixth consecutive semester will be used by the Chancellor's Office to write a comprehensive, systemwide report of the findings from the compliance review cycle. The first round of reviews is anticipated to be completed by February 2025.

Upon completion of the compliance review process, the Chancellor's Office shall create a comprehensive report of the aggregate results to be published online, while maintaining appropriate confidentiality and privacy.

California State Auditor's Assessment of 1-Year Status: Partially Implemented

The Chancellor's Office's updated attachment for compliance reviews states that it will conduct regular compliance reviews of Title IX/DHR programs of each university campus to be completed at least once every three years. The updated attachment indicates that the compliance review will determine whether the campuses' practices are in alignment with Nondiscrimination Policy, state and federal law, and best practices for identifying, preventing, and addressing sexual harassment and related conduct. The attachment also indicates that the Chancellor's Office shall create a comprehensive report of the aggregate results to be published online, while maintaining appropriate confidentiality and privacy. It further indicates that the report will include any identified action items or steps taken to address identified areas of concern. The Chancellor's Office also provided an organizational chart and assignments for the staff that will conduct these reviews. Now that the Chancellor's Office has established this process, we will assess this recommendation as partially implemented until the Chancellor's Office provides examples of its compliance reviews of campuses and its publication of the results of these reviews.

6-Month Agency Response

The Chancellor's Office is developing the process by which it will conduct regular compliance reviews and the mechanism for reporting the results. The process is expected to be finalized by July 2024. Reviews are expected to begin in August 2024 and results from the first round of reviews are anticipated by February 2025.

California State Auditor's Assessment of 6-Month Status: Pending

60-Day Agency Response

The Chancellor's Office Nondiscrimination Policy workgroup met in August 2023 to discuss the development of a policy, or an attachment to the current sexual harassment policy, for conducting regular compliance reviews of the campus Title IX offices.

California State Auditor's Assessment of 60-Day Status: Pending

Recommendation #15 To: University, California State

To encourage systemwide adoption of best practices, the Chancellor's Office should, by January 2025, make revisions to its systemwide prevention policy or otherwise provide written guidance to campuses reflecting comprehensive best practices for preventing, detecting, and addressing sexual harassment. To develop these best practices, it should consult sources such as the U.S. Department of Justice's 2021 resolution agreement with San José State. The best practices should cover at least the following:

- How campuses should maintain accessible options for reporting sexual harassment.

- How campuses can widely disseminate information about their sexual harassment reporting options and related processes through methods such as campus-wide emails, social media platforms, on-campus postings, and student handbooks.

- How campuses can develop and distribute streamlined informational materials that explain key aspects of their processes related to sexual harassment.

- How campuses can monitor whether students and employees have completed required training.

- How campuses can most effectively make use of climate surveys through steps such as surveying both students and employees, designing surveys to assess the effectiveness of their sexual harassment prevention and education efforts, and establishing a documented process for taking action in response to survey findings.

1-Year Agency Response

The Chancellor's Office Prevention Policy focus group is continuing to meet and use the insights and recommendations from the California State Auditor Sexual Harassment/Title IX audit report as well as the Cozen O'Connor assessment to inform revisions to the systemwide prevention policy. This work will be led by the senior systemwide director for civil rights, programming, and services.

California State Auditor's Assessment of 1-Year Status: Pending

6-Month Agency Response

The Chancellor's Office Prevention Policy focus group is continuing to meet and use the insights and recommendations from the California State Auditor Sexual Harassment/Title IX audit report as well as the Cozen O'Connor assessment to inform revisions to the systemwide prevention policy.

California State Auditor's Assessment of 6-Month Status: Pending

60-Day Agency Response

The Chancellor's Office has established a Prevention Policy focus group that includes the Director of Systemwide Clery and Campus Safety Compliance, several campus Clery coordinators, as well as prevention specialists. The focus group met in July and August to discuss the California State Auditor Sexual Harassment/Title IX report recommendations as well as the Cozen O'Connor Title IX and Discrimination, Harassment, and Retaliation (DHR) Assessment Systemwide Report recommendations. The focus group will use feedback from the two reports to inform revisions to the systemwide prevention policy. The focus group plans to meet twice a month.

California State Auditor's Assessment of 60-Day Status: Pending

Recommendation #16 To: University, California State

To ensure that campuses do not endorse employees who have been found responsible for sexual harassment, the Chancellor's Office should amend its policy for letters of recommendation by July 2024 to prohibit official positive references for all employees or former employees with findings of sexual harassment, including those who have received less severe discipline than termination, such as suspension or demotion. Alternatively, the Chancellor's Office could consider amending its policy for letters of recommendation to require that official positive references for employees or former employees with findings of sexual harassment that did not lead to separation include a disclosure of the employee's violation of CSU's sexual harassment policy.

1-Year Agency Response

The Chancellor's Office amended its policy for letters of recommendation, effective March 2024, to prohibit official positive references for all employees or former employees with findings of sexual harassment, including those who have received less severe discipline than termination.

California State Auditor's Assessment of 1-Year Status: Fully Implemented

The Chancellor's Office's amended policy for letters of recommendation states that employees found to have engaged in sexual harassment or other misconduct in violation of CSU's Nondiscrimination policy shall not receive a positive letter of reference even if they were not separated from employment at the CSU as a result of the finding. This policy implements our recommendation.

6-Month Agency Response

A proposed revised policy will be presented to the Board of Trustees for discussion at the January 2024 meeting.

California State Auditor's Assessment of 6-Month Status: Pending

60-Day Agency Response

The Chancellor's Office is evaluating various options to ensure that campuses do not endorse employees who have been found responsible for sexual harassment.

California State Auditor's Assessment of 60-Day Status: Pending

All Recommendations in 2022-109

Agency responses received are posted verbatim.