Report 2009-109 Recommendation 48 Responses
Report 2009-109: Sacramento and Marin Superior Courts: Both Courts Need to Ensure That Family Court Appointees Have Necessary Qualifications, Improve Administrative Policies and Procedures, and Comply With Laws and Rules (Release Date: January 2011)
Recommendation #48 To: Superior Court of California, County of Sacramento
To strengthen its processes related to minor’s counsel fees, the Sacramento superior and family courts should take the steps necessary to confirm that accounting does not make duplicate or erroneous payments to minor’s counsel.
1-Year Agency Response
The Sacramento superior and family courts stated that the accounting staff implemented the procedures for processing minor’s counsel invoices and have taken steps to assure the duplicate payments are not remitted to minor’s counsel. (See 2013-406, p. 162)
- Response Date: December 2012
California State Auditor's Assessment of 1-Year Status: Fully Implemented
All Recommendations in 2009-109
Agency responses received after June 2013 are posted verbatim.